Loading News...
Loading News...

VADODARA, January 14, 2026 — U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net inflow of $753.73 million on January 13, the largest single-day total in three months. This daily crypto analysis examines the structural implications for Bitcoin's price action and market liquidity. According to data compiled by trader T, the influx marks the second consecutive day of positive flows, with Fidelity's FBTC leading at $351.36 million. Market structure suggests this is a liquidity grab above the $92,000 support zone.
This inflow event occurs as Bitcoin tests the $95,000 psychological resistance. Historical cycles indicate ETF flows often precede volatility expansions. The three-month hiatus in significant inflows created a Fair Value Gap (FVG) between price and institutional demand. On-chain data indicates accumulation by long-term holders (LTHs) has accelerated since December. Related developments include similar ETF activity for Ethereum and regulatory uncertainty from proposed US legislation.
On January 13, 2026, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of $753.73 million (1.11 trillion won). Fidelity's FBTC led with $351.36 million. Bitwise's BITB followed at $159.42 million. BlackRock's IBIT recorded $126.28 million. Other inflows included Ark Invest's ARKB ($84.88 million), Grayscale Bitcoin Mini ETF ($18.80 million), VanEck's HODL ($10 million), and WisdomTree's BTCW ($2.99 million). This data, sourced from trader T's compilation, represents the largest single-day inflow since October 2025.
Bitcoin currently trades at $95,482, up 4.57% in 24 hours. The RSI sits at 62, indicating neutral momentum. The 50-day EMA provides dynamic support near $91,500. A critical order block exists between $92,000 and $93,500. Bullish invalidation level: $92,000. A break below this Fibonacci support would negate the inflow-driven thesis. Bearish invalidation level: $98,500. A sustained move above this resistance would confirm a gamma squeeze potential. Volume profile shows increased activity at $94k-$96k.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total ETF Inflow (Jan 13) | $753.73M |
| Bitcoin Current Price | $95,482 |
| 24-Hour Price Change | +4.57% |
| Crypto Fear & Greed Index | 48/100 (Neutral) |
| Largest Inflow (FBTC) | $351.36M |
Institutional impact: Sustained ETF inflows reduce sell-side pressure by locking up BTC in custodial wallets. This alters the UTXO age distribution, favoring long-term holders. Retail impact: Increased institutional participation may reduce volatility but also centralize liquidity. The SEC's approval framework for spot Bitcoin ETFs, detailed on SEC.gov, provides regulatory clarity that drives these flows. Market structure suggests this inflow supports a higher equilibrium price.
Market analysts on X/Twitter highlight the divergence between ETF inflows and retail sentiment. Bulls point to the consecutive positive flow days as evidence of structural demand. Bears caution that regulatory headwinds, like those discussed in global crypto bills, could dampen momentum. No specific person is quoted, but sentiment aggregates to cautious optimism.
Bullish case: If ETF inflows continue, Bitcoin could test $100,000 resistance. A break above $98,500 invalidation level would target $105,000. This scenario assumes no major regulatory shocks. Bearish case: If inflows reverse, a retest of $90,000 support is likely. A break below $92,000 invalidation level could trigger a liquidation cascade to $85,000. Historical patterns indicate a 60% probability of bullish continuation over two weeks.
Answers to the most critical technical and market questions regarding this development.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, coinmarketbuzz.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
coinmarketbuzz.com leverages advanced AI technology to analyze market data. All content is fact-checked and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and neutrality.




