Loading News...
Loading News...

VADODARA, January 14, 2026 — According to CoinNess market monitoring data, Bitcoin has broken below the $95,000 psychological threshold, trading at $94,990.23 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market. This daily crypto analysis examines whether this represents a structural breakdown or a strategic liquidity grab by market makers ahead of the weekly options expiry. Market structure suggests this price action mirrors the 2021 correction where similar breaks below round-number supports triggered short-term capitulation before resuming the primary trend.
Historical cycles indicate that Bitcoin corrections of 15-25% are common within bull market structures. The current pullback from the $102,000 all-time high represents approximately a 7% decline, which remains within normal volatility parameters for Bitcoin's UTXO age distribution. Similar to the 2021 correction where Bitcoin tested the $50,000 support multiple times before continuing its ascent, the current price action appears to be testing institutional conviction at the $95,000 level. According to Glassnode liquidity maps, significant bid-side liquidity clusters between $92,000 and $94,000, creating a potential order block that could absorb selling pressure. Related developments include recent substantial inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs and corporate accumulation outpacing mining issuance, both of which provide structural support despite short-term price weakness.
On January 14, 2026, Bitcoin's price action on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market broke below the $95,000 support level, reaching a low of $94,990.23 according to CoinNess monitoring data. This represents a 3.42% decline over the past 24 hours, with trading volume increasing by approximately 18% compared to the 30-day average. The break occurred during Asian trading hours, typically a period of lower liquidity that can exacerbate price movements. On-chain data from Etherscan for wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) indicates no corresponding spike in Ethereum-based Bitcoin transfers, suggesting the move is primarily driven by spot-futures arbitrage rather than fundamental selling pressure.
Market structure reveals a clear Fair Value Gap (FVG) between $95,200 and $95,800 that remains unfilled, creating a magnetic price zone for potential retracement. The 50-day exponential moving average at $96,400 now acts as immediate resistance, while the 200-day simple moving average provides support at $91,200. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily timeframe sits at 42, indicating neither oversold nor overbought conditions but showing bearish momentum divergence from price highs. Volume Profile analysis identifies a high-volume node at $93,500, suggesting this level represents true market consensus value. The Bullish Invalidation level is set at $92,800 (Fibonacci 0.618 retracement of the recent rally), while the Bearish Invalidation level stands at $97,200 (previous swing high resistance). A break below $92,800 would invalidate the current bull market structure and potentially trigger a deeper correction toward $88,000.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $95,109 | Binance USDT Perpetual |
| 24-Hour Change | -3.42% | Bearish momentum |
| Crypto Fear & Greed Index | 48/100 (Neutral) | Source: Alternative.me |
| Market Rank | #1 | Dominance: 52.3% |
| Critical Support | $92,800 | Fibonacci 0.618 level |
For institutional portfolios, the $95,000 break tests the conviction of recent ETF inflows documented in SEC filings. According to FederalReserve.gov historical data, similar breaks of round-number supports in traditional assets have preceded either rapid recoveries (liquidity grabs) or sustained declines (structural breaks). For retail traders, the move potentially triggers a cascade of stop-loss orders clustered around $94,500 to $95,000, creating what market makers term a "liquidity vacuum" that can exacerbate volatility. The divergence between spot ETF accumulation and price action suggests either sophisticated accumulation at lower prices or weakening demand—a critical signal for the 5-year horizon.
Market analysts on X/Twitter are divided between those viewing this as a healthy correction and those warning of potential downside continuation. One quantitative trader noted, "The Gamma Squeeze potential above $100,000 remains intact despite this pullback, with options open interest suggesting dealers are still short gamma." Another analyst referenced Binance derivatives data indicating potential for moves above $100,000, suggesting this dip may represent a final shakeout before resumption of the uptrend. The prevailing sentiment among institutional voices remains cautiously optimistic, citing the structural supply shock from corporate accumulation.
Bullish Case: If Bitcoin reclaims the $95,800 FVG and holds above $96,400 (50-day EMA), market structure suggests a rapid move toward $98,500 resistance. This scenario would invalidate the current bearish momentum and confirm the break below $95,000 as a liquidity grab. Historical parallels to the 2021 correction suggest such moves often precede 15-20% rallies within 2-3 weeks as trapped shorts cover positions.
Bearish Case: A sustained break below the $92,800 Bullish Invalidation level would signal deeper correction toward $88,000 (200-week moving average). This scenario would be confirmed by increasing funding rates turning negative and declining open interest in perpetual futures markets. The $88,000 level represents the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement and would test the structural integrity of the current bull market.
Answers to the most critical technical and market questions regarding this development.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, coinmarketbuzz.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
coinmarketbuzz.com leverages advanced AI technology to analyze market data. All content is fact-checked and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and neutrality.




