Loading News...
Loading News...

VADODARA, January 17, 2026 — The Ripple vs. SEC legal saga is definitively closed. Market structure suggests political pressure cannot override the legal doctrine of res judicata. According to UToday, pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan stated the case cannot be reopened despite criticism from Democratic lawmakers. This provides a critical Daily crypto analysis point: regulatory overhang is eliminated.
The SEC's 2020 lawsuit against Ripple created a multi-year Fair Value Gap (FVG) in XRP's price action. The legal uncertainty acted as a persistent Order Block, capping institutional adoption. The July 2023 summary judgment, which found XRP was not a security in programmatic sales, began the process of closing this gap. The recent political noise—criticism of the SEC for dropping cases against Ripple, Kraken, Binance, and Coinbase—threatened to reintroduce volatility. However, legal precedent is a stronger force than political sentiment. Related developments in regulatory scrutiny include the ongoing insider trading investigations affecting other major assets.
On Tuesday, Bill Morgan clarified the legal . Per his statement, the principle of res judicata prevents relitigation of a concluded case. The SEC's lawsuit against Ripple reached a final judgment last year with a victory for Ripple. Morgan noted that while some U.S. House Democrats have criticized the SEC's enforcement decisions, alleging political donation influence, the case remains closed. This aligns with legal documentation on SEC.gov regarding final agency actions.
XRP currently trades at $2.07. The 24-hour trend shows a minor uptick of 0.84%. On-chain data indicates a consolidation pattern above the $1.95 support, a critical Volume Profile node. The weekly chart shows a Bullish Invalidation level at $1.80—a break below would signal a failed breakout and target lower liquidity pools. The Bearish Invalidation level sits at $2.25; a sustained move above would confirm a new bullish impulse phase and invalidate the current resistance structure. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily timeframe is at 58, suggesting neutral momentum without overbought conditions.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Crypto Fear & Greed Index | 50/100 (Neutral) |
| XRP Current Price | $2.07 |
| XRP 24h Change | +0.84% |
| XRP Market Rank | #5 |
| Key Support (Bullish Invalidation) | $1.80 |
For institutions, this legal finality removes a key operational risk. Custody solutions and ETF applications for XRP, previously hindered, may now see accelerated development. For retail, the reduction in headline regulatory risk decreases volatility drag, allowing price to reflect underlying network utility like Ripple's ODL (On-Demand Liquidity) corridors. The closure prevents a potential Liquidity Grab that political uncertainty could have triggered.
Market analysts on X/Twitter are parsing the implications. The consensus: legal certainty is a net positive, but the focus shifts to macroeconomic headwinds and broader market liquidity conditions. Sentiment is cautiously optimistic, with no expectation of a near-term Gamma Squeeze driven solely by this news.
Bullish Case: A clean hold above $1.95 support, coupled with increasing institutional on-ramps, could propel XRP to test the $2.50 resistance zone within Q1 2026. This scenario assumes stable Bitcoin dominance and no adverse macro shocks.
Bearish Case: Failure to hold $1.80 support would indicate weak demand. This could lead to a retest of the $1.50 region, especially if correlated with a broader market liquidity drain from staking or ETF flows.
Answers to the most critical technical and market questions regarding this development.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, coinmarketbuzz.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.
coinmarketbuzz.com leverages advanced AI technology to analyze market data. All content is fact-checked and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and neutrality.



